guymar 113 posts msg #92037 - Ignore guymar |
5/4/2010 11:34:43 AM
This represents some extra work :-))) Cannot guarantee to come back with swift feedback on this one......
|
davesaint86 726 posts msg #92059 - Ignore davesaint86 modified |
5/4/2010 7:04:14 PM
Kevin,
I'm curious if you ran the same test sorting on RS instead of Alpha would the returns be higher since your Jan 1 2007 start date. I used my 401k ETF equivalents as the selections. The RS in this filter is based on a 4 week cycle. The RS may be close to your 21 day Alpha.
|
hmsb4494 81 posts msg #92077 - Ignore hmsb4494 |
5/5/2010 12:57:06 AM
KEVIN---
On your based on price filter above, can you make it to show the etf the day it changes from a sell to a buy and a buy to a sell???
|
guymar 113 posts msg #92084 - Ignore guymar |
5/5/2010 3:39:09 AM
People, I can't do all the backtesting fast enough here :)
I have the following idea: use the McLellan Oscillator to change the baskets of ETF's in function of market situation (you could use 3 models with different SYM lists for example....) and optimize like this. These models are simply crying out for a good framework (an objective one) to be put in.
Might ask my son to help with the back-testing .....
|
guymar 113 posts msg #92100 - Ignore guymar |
5/5/2010 10:02:15 AM
I would like to combine this with the formula:
But I get an error on the last line, the attempt is to have a 3 period exponential moving average to get the V*PMO or Volume Price Momentum Oscillator......the idea would be to avoid some trades by not taking the trade if this indicator gives a sell signal...
|
guymar 113 posts msg #92102 - Ignore guymar |
5/5/2010 10:21:24 AM
Got it now, I am going to test the following:
Buy selected ETF only if VPMO positive .....
|
Kevin_in_GA 4,599 posts msg #92104 - Ignore Kevin_in_GA |
5/5/2010 10:26:51 AM
I would like to combine this with the formula:
But I get an error on the last line, the attempt is to have a 3 period exponential moving average to get the V*PMO or Volume Price Momentum Oscillator......the idea would be to avoid some trades by not taking the trade if this indicator gives a sell signal...
++++++++++++++
You have a space between CEMA and "(" that screws it up. Also you need to say "draw" rather than plot - I corrected it above.
Not sure if this meshes with the short filter I wrote here - it's goal is a once a month rotation/rebalancing between a small set of ETF options. This additional criterion may result in no trades, which would not be possible in an account like a 401k (you basically have to be in something all the time, and it must be long-only options).
|
guymar 113 posts msg #92106 - Ignore guymar modified |
5/5/2010 10:38:44 AM
That's not what I want to do: go to choice 2 in list alpha or stay in current ETF, so the idea would be:
Check Alfa and PVMO. Go to next Alfa if PVMO negative until PVMO positive. If no Alfa available above or equal 2 with PVMO postive, go long SHY
|
sbuck143 88 posts msg #92107 - Ignore sbuck143 |
5/5/2010 10:55:01 AM
One thing with the "401k" thought Kevin - monthly updates are probably too fast for a 401k. It didn't used to be like this, but my 401k currently with Schwab (and my wife's with Citistreet) restricts you to 1 redemption every 60 days. So if I move out of a fund, I can't get back in for 60 days. I'm going to investigate the quarterly rebalancing on ETFreplay, once they get a few more slots opened up for ETF's to add.
|
guymar 113 posts msg #92109 - Ignore guymar |
5/5/2010 11:11:55 AM
My interest is obviously different, I live in Europe, so I'm looking more for a strategy that is low time consuming for a larger portfolio .....
|